In response to a comment received re the Section 106 Agreement monies (see page): whilst the £40000+ might not have been spent on Checkley Lane (although with some persuasion it might have been) it could have been spent on affordable housing in Wrinehill/Betley given that this was a stated need in the Betley neighbourhood plan. The suggestion that information on this blog are 'potentially misleading' are some what mischievous, in my view. I have found reading the Minutes of the Parish Council meetings can also be misleading - although they claim to be true. This does not necessarily mean that they are accurate. It seems that there is not only one version of the truth these days, but several. Read everything with care. Preferably attend meetings and get your information first hand, then make up your own mind rather than have someone else make up your mind for you and tell you what to think.
Clarification
It has been noted in the Minutes of the meeting held on 27 June 2024 Minute 5 a statement made about this blog 'by a member of the parish council'- 'that any comments submitted to the author of the blog which questioned the factual accuracy of the contents of its reports were ignored and not published'. This is an assumption (yet another) not a fact. It also seems to be yet another example of attempts to undermine the integrity of the blog (and its author). The blog, it has been noted, presents another view point which often differs from the 'standard'/'official' view presented via the Minutes particularly, where statements are made and treated as if they were universal truths rather than just 'a view' of a group of people. It needs to be pointed out here, therefore, that all comments received are read and considered, even though they come from a very small pool of anonymous, in the main, individuals, some with obvious agendas and with mali...
Comments
Post a Comment