Removal

 


I recently received  a notice from the Clerk of Betley Parish Council (see below) but,

'Tell it not in Gath, proclaim it not in the streets of Ashkelon,

lest the daughters of the Philistines rejoice,
lest the sons of the uncircumcised triumph.
with an apology to (2 Samuel v19).

I would like to thank everyone who gave support over the past three years, much appreciated, and to say that it was a pleasure and privilege to have been a Councillor for WrinehilI.  Given the set up of the Parish Council and the state of play it was impossible to represent you in the way that I would have wished or that Wrinehill deserved.  The odds of  12 - 1 was not conducive to  turning things around to ensure fair play, equitable distribution of resources, accountability and transparency.   Under the grimmest of  circumstances that I have ever encountered, I did what I could.  I had every intention and determination to remain until 2026 until fate intervened.  I remain with you , however, in spirit. The blog will continue!  
  

31st March 2025 

Dear Councillor Drakakis-Smith

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 – SECTION 85

 I write to notify you that in accordance with the Local Government Act 1972 – Section 85, you will cease to be a Parish Councillor of Betley, Balterley and Wrinehill Parish Council, on the 3rd April 2025.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your contributions to the Parish Council, and wish you all the very best for the future. 

Yours sincerely

Muna Clough

 Parish Clerk and Responsible Financial Officer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Clarification

 It has been noted in the Minutes of the meeting held on 27 June 2024 Minute 5 a statement made about this blog 'by a member of the parish council'- 'that  any comments submitted to the author of the blog which questioned the factual accuracy of the contents of its reports were ignored and not published'.  This is an assumption (yet another) not a fact.   It also seems to be yet another example of attempts to undermine the integrity of the blog (and its author). The blog, it has been noted, presents another view point which often differs from the 'standard'/'official' view presented via the Minutes particularly, where statements are made and treated as if they were universal truths rather than just  'a view' of a group of people. It needs to be pointed out here, therefore, that all comments received are read and considered, even though they come from a very small pool of anonymous, in the main, individuals, some with obvious agendas and with mali...
Read more

When a Hearing is not a Hearing

 Anyone attempting to follow the Hearing of 30 April 2024 might have found it difficult to follow since the microphones were not working properly neither were the subtitles up to scratch.  'Councillor' was transcribed as 'Chancellor', for example - and that was the least of it.  Trying to follow what was being said using the subtitles was therefore not only difficult but almost impossible.  The text presented to the hearing is below:    I am attending this hearing because it is important to know what it is that I am being accused of. The Monitoring Officer in June 2023 asked the complainants to provide him with the 'specifics'   - ie the evidence to support their allegations.     Without it, he stated   he could not proceed.   It has taken two years and a new MO to arrive at this point.   2024 is a different country, it seems.       If evidence was submitted, then I have not seen it.   I have looked at ...
Read more

Behind Closed Doors 2: Recent Parish Council Meeting Highlights Ongoing Tensions

At the last Parish Council meeting, the Chair and Vice Chair presented a verbal summary of the Clerk's performance appraisal, as part of fulfilling the Council's annual requirement. However, the written report was not shared with members, prompting one Councillor to request its circulation. This request was declined by the Chair.  The Vice Chair expressed loudly, his strong objections to the question, stating that his integrity was being questioned, before leaving the meeting abruptly (slamming the door). During the public forum, three of the attendees read statements criticizing the local blog and Wrinehill residents' newsletter.  One being the former Clerk questioned the Councillor's vote on the end-of-year accounts. He also raised concerns about the Councillor's actions, suggesting that any queries about the Parish Council accounts should be addressed to him (rather than to the proper auditing authorities'. The statements, read out (which later became attache...
Read more